|  Newsletter
Blogs  |  ProTV  |  Message Boards  |  Sweepstakes  |  Best of HGTVPro
HGTVPro.com
Newsletter Signup
Subscribe to HGTVProFile for
timely information on new
products, best practices,
professional advice and more.

Subscribe Now!
Sponsored Content





Message Boards

 
  boards.hgtvpro.com
  HGTVPro Message Boards
Hop To Forum Categories   Best Practices
Hop To Forums   Framing
  I wanted to move a wall 16 inches but...
Go
New
Find
Notify
Tools
Reply
  
  Login/Join 
Posted
I didn't think it'd be a load-bearing one! The wall divides my master bedroom and the master bath. The section of wall I want to move is only 6 feet. However, that same wall continues for another 12 feet separating the master bedroom from the main bathroom of the home. This wall is only 5 feet from and parallel to an exterior wall. That is why I didn't think it'd be a load-bearing partition. The wall in question has double top plates and looking at the floor joists from the basement, is directly above and parallel to two sistered 2x7s. My questions are 1)Is this wall load-bearing? 2)If so, can I sister another 2x7 to the adjacent floor joist and move the 6 foot section of wall directly over the newly sistered floor joists without a problem? I could leave the existing wall in place until the new wall is complete. I'm moving this wall to make my master bath a bit more practicle to a whooping 6'x6.5' Big Grin Any and all help is greatly appreciated. Thanks all!!!
 
Posts: 2 | Location: Long Island, NY | Registered: 04 February 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
There ain't no such animal as a 2x7. Are you sure they're not 2x8's? If the ceiling joists are parallel to the wall, chances are the wall isn't load-bearing. If so, and the floor joists are running parallel to the wall also, chances are the wall isn't load-bearing. But, the only person who can actually say for sure is the qualified design professional who has examined the house first-hand, and has taken into account all existing conditions which might affect the removal of the wall.

If it is a non-load-bearing wall, it is conventional to provide a double joist directly under the partition to carry the additional load of the wall itself. If the wall is moved, then double joists should be installed directly under the new wall location, for the same reason.

Have someone knowledgeable examine your house first-hand before you go chopping wood.


Architect (NY) and Home Designer (PA)
 
Posts: 2500 | Location: Tobyhanna, PA | Registered: 24 October 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
Thanks for the quick reply. I was apprehensive about calling it a 2x7, but when I measured it, the thickness was 1-3/4" and the width was exactly 7" - I was figuring it would've been 7-3/4" - The house was built in 1971. I won't have a chance to confirm the direction of the ceiling joists until tomorrow.

Wouldn't it be odd for a partition to be load-bearing seeing as it was erected just 5 feet from an obviously load-bearing, exterior wall?

Who should I call to verify this? Would I call an architect? Would posting pictures of my situation help you make a determination?

By the way, this is a one floor ranch.

Thanks again Richard!
 
Posts: 2 | Location: Long Island, NY | Registered: 04 February 2008Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
Posted Hide Post
An architect, or a structural engineer, or even a good contractor will be able to advise you. It's just a matter of someone seeing everything there is to see...even a picture can be misleading. Don't pay a ton of money for it...you'll find someone who will do it either inexpensively, or as a favor.


Architect (NY) and Home Designer (PA)
 
Posts: 2500 | Location: Tobyhanna, PA | Registered: 24 October 2005Reply With QuoteEdit or Delete MessageReport This Post
 Previous Topic | Next Topic powered by eve community  
 

    boards.hgtvpro.com    HGTVPro Message Boards  Hop To Forum Categories  Best Practices  Hop To Forums  Framing    I wanted to move a wall 16 inches but...